Tarasoff and Kelley claimed to remedy the previous flaws by: using MSG in capsules and a soft drink to prevent aftertaste bias; eliminating data from individuals who did report an aftertaste, also to eliminate bias; using more rigorous statistical analysis; and most of all, reducing the possibility of symptom suggestion by telling subjects they were participating in the "evaluation of a new soft drink," thereby avoiding all mention of the terms MSG, or Chinese Restaurant Syndrome. Their study challenged 71 individuals with doses of 1 g-3.15 g and found no significant difference between the number of reactions reported in the test and placebos (22).
Although some individuals experience sensations, collectively referred to as the Chinese Restaurant Syndrome, there is no clinical data that links MSG, when used as a food additive, with any long-term adverse consequences.
(1977), "Ventricular Tachycardia in a Patient with the 'Chinese Restaurant Syndrome," South Med J, 70(7):879-881.
The study, says Kenney, shows that if Chinese restaurant syndrome does indeed exist, it takes more than MSG to trigger it.
Prior to the study, half the men had reported symptoms of Chinese restaurant syndrome.
Even the FDA acknowledges that MSG causes something like Chinese Restaurant Syndrome.
(2) Seven also had the symptoms of Chinese Restaurant Syndrome. They reacted within one to two hours after consuming the MSG.