Phase 2 Later clinical stage Phase 2 studies are designed to evaluate the short-term therapeutic effect of a new drug in Pts who suffer from the target disease, and confirm the safety established in phase I trials; phase 2 studies are sometimes placebo-controlled, often double-blinded, enroll a larger number of Pts than in phase 1 and Pt followup may be for longer periods; phase 2 studies are tailored to specific treatment indications for which the company plans to seek broader approval; where compelling scientific evidence is presented, the FDA expedites review of a company's application for market clearance; expedited review of phase 2 clinical data, and clearance of that early application, can obviate requirements for phase 3 trials; phase 2's involve several hundred Pts and generate enough data to
1. at least suggest–if not prove that the drug actually works–efficacy and.
2. demonstrate the most common side effects Glossaries, nih.gov-6/99; phase 2 trials are sometimes divided into phase 2a pilot trials and phase 2b well-controlled trials
Phase 3 Final clinical stage Phase 3 trials are designed to demonstrate the potential advantages of the new therapy over other therapies already on the market; safety and efficacy of the new therapy are studied over a longer period of time and in many more Pts enrolled into the study with less restrictive eligibility criteria; phase 3 studies are intended to help scientists identify rarer side effects of treatment and prepare for a broader application of the product; phase 3 trials enroll 1,000-3,000 Pts to verify efficacy and monitor adverse reactions during longer-term use–sometimes divided into Phase 3a trials, conducted before regulatory submission and Phase 3b trials, conducted after regulatory submission, but before approval
Phase 4 Post-FDA approval/post-marketing Phase 4 studies involve many thousands of Pts and compare its efficacy with a gold standard; some agents have been withdrawn from the market because they increase the mortality rate in treated Pts; concurrent with marketing approval, FDA may seek agreement from the sponsor to conduct certain postmarketing–phase 4 studies to delineate additional information about the drug's risks, benefits, and optimal use, and could include, but would not be limited to, studying different doses or schedules of administration than were used in phase 2 studies, use of the drug in other Pt populations or other stages of the disease, or use of the drug over a longer period of time 21 CFR §312.85
Note: Occasionally, an agent's benefit is so obvious, eg zidovudine–AZT that the need for phase 3 studies, a stage immediately preceding an official NDA, may be obviated; NDA–new drug applications were often rejected because the data from the phase 2 and 3 trials revealed study design flaws, forcing the sponsor to repeat work, which has been largely eliminated by the '1987 rewrite' of the IND status
.