Temperatures from oral
electronic thermometers were compared to core body temperatures in 7 total samples.
Because of late installation of
electronic thermometers or their loss or failure, fewer data (ca.
Depending upon the mode selected,
electronic thermometers yield results in a few seconds and up to 80 seconds (Barringer et al., 2011; Fadzil et al., 2010; Khorshid, Eser, Zaybak, & Yapucu, 2005), while chemical thermometers require 3 to 5 minutes or more to register an axillary temperature (Martin & Kline, 2004).
Nondisposable oral
electronic thermometer (reference standard): Sure Temp Plus
electronic thermometer (Welch Allyn, Skaneateles Fall, NY).
Acceptable bias and precision values found in this study are similar to a number of well-controlled prior studies which compared the temporal artery thermometer to core temperature measures (pulmonary artery or bladder catheter thermistors) (Calonder et al., 2010; Langham et al., 2009; Lawson et al., 2007; Lee et al., 2011; Siberry, Diener-West, Schappell, & Karron, 2002) or oral
electronic thermometers (Barringer et al., 2011; Fountain et al., 2008; Frommelt et al., 2008).
The inaccuracy of axillary temperatures measured with an
electronic thermometer. American Journal of Diseases of Children, 144(1), 109-111.
Mean difference values were based on clinical judgment and experts' opinion (Erickson & Meyers, 1994; Giuliano et al., 1999; Lawson et al., 2007) that differences between the test temperature device (temporal artery thermometer) and the reference temperature (oral
electronic thermometer) of greater than 0.6[degrees]F would limit the clinical utility of that device for temperature measurement and clinical decision-making surrounding temperature management in hospitalized patients.
What is the extent of agreement between the RT readings taken with an
electronic thermometer and the ear-based temperatures taken with the ITT (as measured by the upper and lower limits of the differences)?
Limiting use of these devices to clinical situations where oral
electronic thermometers cannot be used (for example, isolation) would be prudent.
The ongoing evolution of personal care devices was, perhaps, most apparent in the newest
electronic thermometer from the Norelco Consumer Products Co.
In order to evaluate Clinitemp II forehead skin-based temperature strips, Martyn, Urbano, Hayes, and Von Windeguth (1988) used an IVAC (821)
electronic thermometer to measure axillary and rectal temperature in 70 children between 1 and 5 years of age.
Using an
electronic thermometer, over 50% of children with a fever were missed when checked by an axillary temperature.