(redirected from suspicionless)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Legal.
References in periodicals archive ?
The Supreme Court of the United States has only struck down a suspicionless drug test under the special needs doctrine a single time.
suspicionless antiterrorism searches should not be subject to the
"prohibition [on suspicionless searches] is categorical and without
Garcia asked students to imagine they were preparing to attend a public comment session hosted by the school board to share their thoughts on the board's proposal to adopt a policy requiring all high schools in the district to administer random, suspicionless drug tests on any enrolled student.
(43) In contrast, random suspicionless drug testing of current employees is the most controversial form of drug testing, and its constitutionality has often been linked to the nature of the position at issue, and whether safety concerns create a high degree of regulation in the industry.
She argued that her Fourth Amendment rights were violated by the District Court's conditions allowing (1) random chemical testing initiated by law enforcement and (2) suspicionless searches of her person, property and residence.
The Court has repeatedly visited this same terrain during the 21st century, as it has addressed whether the war on drugs can justify subjecting students both to suspicionless drug tests and to strip searches and limiting their free speech rights.
Courts have yet to establish that suspicionless searches of electronic devices are an unreasonable invasion of privacy, which is why we advise travellers to minimize the data that is stored on their devices when crossing the border said Meghan McDermott, Staff Counsel at BCCLA.
2017 issued on April 19, 2017 where incumbent public officials and employees of government agencies and government-owned and controlled corporations (GOCCs) shall be made to undergo a "mandatory, random, and suspicionless" drug testing as a condition for retention in service.
Contractualism also draws attention to other justifying principles, such as a protection principle, and so explains how and when suspicionless searches and seizures are reasonable.
Strieff, (2) she wrote, describing the victims of suspicionless stops by police, "Until their voices matter too, our justice system will continue to be anything but." (3) Her insistence on respect for the system, then, is a practical one: the system will work best, and we will get the best results from it, if we adopt the attitudes she models.