The Court held that the "inquiry involved in a ruling on a motion for summary judgment or for a directed verdict necessarily implicates the substantive evidentiary standard of proof that would apply at the trial on the merits.
48) Thus, Anderson confirms the similarity between directed verdict and modern summary judgment and recognizes that the "substantive law, presumptions, and burdens of production and persuasion" bear on both directed verdict and summary judgment motions.
The Court's holding in Matsushita reveals the extent of the deference afforded to trial courts at the summary judgment phase following Celotex and Anderson.
In sum, the Celotex trilogy reformulated the federal summary judgment standard in two significant ways, both of which greatly increased the utility of summary judgment as procedural device.
Doctrinal issues related to summary judgment surely need no further
concerning how trends in summary judgment disposition relate to the
judges' adjudicatory practices at summary judgment.
empirical evidence concerning summary judgment disposition should be
party's summary judgment burden and appeared to formulate a summary
outcomes on the summary judgment admissibility issue.
trilogy's effect on summary judgment and does not quarrel with the
Furthermore, tying summary judgment burdens of proof to trial