right of action


Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Legal, Wikipedia.

right of action,

n the right to sue; a legal right to maintain an action, based on a happening or state of fact.
Mentioned in ?
References in periodicals archive ?
As we can notice, article 2523 of the new civil code provides a different regulation of the beginning of limitation, as the previous civil code stipulated the fact that the limitation stats running from the date the material right of action comes into existence.
favor of municipal authority to create a private right of action assumes
Even though secondary actors may be subject to liabil ity under current law, proponents of an express private right of action for aiding and abetting argue that it is necessary on policy grounds, with deterrence of fraud and compensation for those who have been harmed by securities fraud chief among them.
Birmingham Board of Education, (4) held that there was no private right of action to enforce anti-retaliation regulations promulgated under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, the Fourth Circuit, in Peters v.
2214, has called the inclusion of an "opt-in" clause--whereby consumers would not receive spam unless they sign up to receive it--along with the inclusion of a private right of action a "nightmare for legitimate business.
The Deskbook thoroughly examines the framework for liability and the goals of the federal statutes providing a right of action for natural resource damages.
However, the Judge wrote "Given the position of the foetus under the law, the legislature must provide express wording to extend the right of action to encompass an unborn child.
THE SEC HAS EXPLICITLY STATED REGULATION FD DOES not create a private right of action under the antifraud provisions of federal securities laws.
Statutory Right of Action Under the Fair Dealing Provisions: The act creates a statutory right of action for damages against any party to a franchise agreement who breaches the duty of fair dealing with respect to either performance or enforcement.
The district court dismissed the case, finding that the treaty between the two countries pertaining to the execution of penal sentences did not provide a private right of action and that the decision to approve a transfer was committed to the discretion of the Attorney General and was not subject to review.
The court also noted that the law was intended to create a private right of action where none had existed, and residents were already able to bring personal injury actions for slips and falls.
It also gives persons having rights in encrypted transmissions or in broadcasting or cable program services, a right of action against persons who infringe on those rights.