negative trial

Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Legal, Encyclopedia.

negative trial

A term of art referring to a clinical trial in which the therapeutic or other intervention is deemed ineffective. In general, negative trials are less likely to be published in major peer-reviewed journals.
Segen's Medical Dictionary. © 2012 Farlex, Inc. All rights reserved.


In the medical sciences, a test or experiment, as of a drug.

adaptive trial

A form of research in which data analyzed as the trial progresses are used to reshape or refocus its design.

clinical trial

A study of the effects of a drug administered to human subjects. The goal is to define the clinical efficacy and pharmacological effects of the drug (toxicity, side effects, incompatibilities, interactions). The U.S. government requires strict testing of all new drugs before their approval for use as therapeutic agents.

Clinical trials address a wide variety of health care topics from treatment and diagnosis to prevention of disease. Trial investigators prove or disprove the value or safety of a particular drug or therapy thought to have a positive effect for patients. Clinical trials are therefore experiments, a quest for evidence. They help establish proof of effectiveness, but they do not imply that such proof already exists.

Patient care

Investigators must employ high ethical standards to ensure that enrollees know how the trial works, the chances of receiving active therapy as opposed to a placebo, the expected outcomes, and what risks and complications the participants may experience. These standards are needed to protect enrollees, esp. those with chronic, poorly controlled, or potentially fatal illnesses from assuming that participation in an experiment guarantees an imminent cure. Participation in the experiment does not guarantee a cure. In many instances trials prove that the intervention tested does not work; in some, that the intervention is hazardous; and, only in a few, that the intervention is as good as doing nothing or as good as the best available contemporary therapy. Even when clinical outcomes are not positive, a trial usually illuminates some elements of pharmacology or pathophysiology that may be used in furthering the understanding of an illness. Many human drug trials, esp. trials of new treatments for cancer, are conducted in four phases, three of them before approval for general use. An increasingly larger number of participants are enrolled for each successive phase

crossover trial

A scientific study of a therapeutic agent in which participants are exposed in sequence to the putative cure and subsequently (or previously) to an inactive agent or an agent whose efficacy has been previously established. The participants cross over from one arm of the study to the other and serve as their own control group.

Participants in such trials are usually under the care of a team of physicians and nurses and are closely monitored, often with testing and examinations on a weekly basis. The clinical trial nurse or nurse research specialist has a broad variety of roles, depending on the nature of the investigation. The roles include recruiting and introducing patients to the trial, coordinating their care, gathering data about side effects and tolerance, and, frequently, serving as a principal or collaborative investigator. Trial planning and design, data interpretation and analysis, and assessments of toxicity are all elements of the work. Health insurers and managed care providers may place restrictions on clinical trial coverage. Many states have laws requiring insurers to pay for the routine costs of all or some clinical trials. Patient advocates work with researchers to make sure a clinical trial is relevant, as safe as possible, and accessible to the broadest variety of patients.

Synonym: crossover (2)

equivalence trial

A randomized clinical trial in which two distinct agents are compared with each other and sometimes with an inert agent (a placebo) as well. If two agents work equally well, the less expensive, better tolerated, or more easily administered one may be preferred.

negative trial

Negative study.

noninferiority trial

A study to determine if a treatment is no worse than the currently accepted therapy.

observational trial

Observational study.

parallel trial

A research study in which groups of patients are followed for the same time but are given different treatments; e.g., one group may receive an inactive substance while another is treated with a drug whose effectiveness must be determined. The impact of the drug can thus be compared with the placebo at varying times, such as 4 weeks, 4 months, or 4 years after the study begins.

PEEP decrement trial

Sequential decreases in positive end-expiratory pressures (PEEP) until the lowest level of PEEP is achieved that improves lung compliance the most, without reducing the patient's partial pressure of oxygen. PEEP is then adjusted to a value just higher than that value.

phase I trial

, phase 1 trial
A clinical trial to determine the toxicity of a new drug. Such trials test safety and maximum dosage, help researchers discover the best way to administer a treatment (orally or intravenously) and the most appropriate dosage. Phase I trials also help to discover potentially harmful adverse effects of a new treatment. Even though the trial is not designed to show whether the treatment is effective, since an experimental drug is chosen for its promise, the patient may still benefit. Only a small number of patients are included (15 to 25 who have not been helped by other treatments), and there usually is no control group.

phase II trial

, phase 2 trial
A clinical trial to determine the potential effectiveness of a new drug. Generally, if at least 20% of the study subjects respond positively to it, e.g., achieve a 50% reduction in the total size of their measurable tumor, the new therapy will receive further testing. Another crucial statistic is the duration of response. Short-term responses may mean little in terms of survival; long-term responses indicate that the drug is benefiting some patients.

phase III trial

, phase 3 trial
A clinical trial to explore the clinical use of a new drug, esp. relative to other known effective agents (the current standard of care). These trials often include thousands of enrollee patients. By law, all such patients receive real treatment; no placebos are given. But the trial is usually double-blinded, with patients divided randomly into two groups: an experimental group and a control group on standard treatment, with neither patients nor researchers knowing to which group the patient belongs.

phase IV trial

, phase 4 trial
A clinical trial to examine long-term effectiveness and adverse effects that might occur from a treatment after the Food and Drug Administration has approved its use by the public. Such trials, involving thousands or tens of thousands of enrollee patients, are either mandated by regulatory authorities or undertaken voluntarily by a pharmaceutical manufacturer once the drug has gone to market. Often it is only in Phase IV trials that especially rare adverse effects emerge. Enrollee patients in a clinical trial should have the approval of their personal oncologist, and they should seek a second opinion (which is covered by insurance) to obtain more input on what trials to consider.

pragmatic trial

A trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a treatment investigated under real-world conditions, rather than during the application of stringent exclusion criteria.

randomized controlled trial

Abbreviation: RCT
An experimental study to assess the effects of a particular variable, e.g., a drug or treatment, in which subjects are assigned randomly to an experimental, placebo, or control group. The experimental group receives the drug or procedure; the placebo group's medication is disguised to resemble the drug being investigated. The control group receives nothing. Members of each group are prevented from knowing whether they are receiving active therapy. The researchers gathering the data are also typically blinded to group assignment.


Although RCTs are an essential element in proving clinical relationships (such as between the use of a new drug and the safe cure of a disease), most RCTs do not enroll enough patients for a long enough time to detect rare events.

spontaneous breathing trial

Spontaneous breathing test.

superiority trial

A study that directly compares two treatments to see which of them achieves better results.
Medical Dictionary, © 2009 Farlex and Partners
References in periodicals archive ?
Doctors and nurses are less likely to jump on a product's bandwagon based on one or two positive studies; but it seems they are also less likely to abandon useful products based on one or two negative trials.
WENBIT wasn't the first negative trial of homocysteine lowering as secondary cardiovascular prevention therapy.
IMAGINE was not the first negative trial involving quinapril in patients undergoing coronary intervention.
The single negative trial involved the use of a poorly absorbed magnesium salt, which produced diarrhea in 45% of the active treatment group, compared with 20% of the placebo group, Dr.
The only study done in class IV patients, the Beta-Blocker Evaluation Survival Trial (BEST), was a negative trial that suggested that bucindolol might actually be harmful.
Maybe there are two positive trials and two negative trials, or maybe there are two positive trials and two failed trials.
High proportion of early published negative trials did not have adequate power due to small sample sizes and Freiman et al.
If the test stimulus was present at the memorized set (positive trials), the participant should press the number 1 key, otherwise (negative trials) he should press the number two key.
Given the study's retrospective nature, lack of a placebo control, and the frequent use of concomitant therapy, the researchers compared the changes in mRSS in the cohort with data from three large negative trials.
Two randomized trials specific to patients with CKD have been published in the literature in recent years--namely the "Atorvastatin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoing hemodialysis" (4D) trial (Wanner, Krane, Marz, et al., 2005) and the "Rosuvastatin and cardiovascular events in patients undergoing Hemodialysis" (AURORA) trial (Fellstrom, Jardine, Schmieder, et al., 2009)--of which both were negative trials, meaning they did not demonstrate a significant benefit to the use of lipid-lowering agents in the prevention of cardiac death, MI, or stroke.
As a rule, negative trials are rarely published in medical journals.