References in periodicals archive ?
Like handedness, studies investigating eyedness as one of the indicators of laterality in schizophrenia have reported contrasting results.
Data analysis: A sample size of 22 was sufficient to detect a difference on the laterality recognition task of 600 ms (Moseley 2004b), with a probability of [greater than or equal to] 80%, assuming [alpha] = 0.05.
This general theory has been widely influential in the interpretation of the results of subsequent EEG laterality effects in the sport literature, including the study by Crews et al.
Participants were assigned to several "laterality conditions" based on their responses to several short questions.
The laterality of stimuli was subject to limited randomization (with the constraint that an equal number of stimuli and blanks were presented to each nostril).
The evolutionary background of laterality is in most cases unknown.
Presence of variation and age group, according to gender and laterality. Variable Women (n=130) Men (n=106) Right Left Bilateral Right Left Bilateral Variation 8 5 39 8 2 46 9 to 17 0 0 3 0 0 1 18 to 30 2 2 2 0 0 6 Age group 31 to 50 1 0 10 1 0 12 51 to 70 4 0 21 5 0 22 71 or more 1 3 3 2 2 5 Variable Total % Variation 108 46 4 4 12 11 Age group 24 22 52 48 16 15 Table III.
RNFL measurement is affected by various factors, most significant being age, gender and axial length.10 There was no difference among two groups in terms of age, gender, laterality of eyes and axial length (p=0.623, 0.886, 0.258 and 0.759 respectively).
However, significant differences were found between experimental groups (p < 0.05) and laterality (p <0.05) in the dorsal hippocampus.
Two different laparoscopic hernia repair techniques were compared, single port Laparoscopic Needle Assisted Repair (LNAR) versus three port technique of PSDIR, regarding demographics, preoperative laterality, operative time, length of hospital stay, analgesia requirement and postoperative complications.
Instead, laterality in exposure, perhaps due to feeding handedness, likely explains the detected field patterns.
The difference in parameters, including gender, kidney anomaly, stone laterality, location, JJ stent usage, opacity, success and complications, between the two groups was analyzed using the Pearson chi-square test.