On or about March 14, 2016, while traveling in Italy,
defendant PAPADOPOULOS met an individual who was a professor based in London (the "Professor").
Plaintiff next observed the
defendant "put down whatever he was holding" and "walk from behind the counter towards" plaintiff and exit the restaurant.
In June 1996, the First and Second
Defendants brought a subsidiary action against the First Joined
Defendant (the main contractor in the construction of the Project) in the same case claiming damages equal to the amount that the First and Second
Defendants would be ordered to pay to the Plaintiff should the Plaintiff succeed in its claim.
The bureau asked the court to try all four
defendants under different sections of the Anti-Bribery Law and under Article Two of the Royal Decree No.
The absence of amendment severely undercuts the notion that Congress intended something other than the plain language that requires proper joinder and service of a forum
defendant in order for Section 1441(b) to prohibit removal.
Ajaga Agboko told the court that the
defendant committed the offences on July 6 at about 2:00 p.m.
He contacted the
defendant who told him that the transaction was a mistake by the bank and that the money would return to his account.
In a statement of claim accompanying the writ, the estate company said it would contend at the trial that Access Bank Ghana PLC had given its blessings to the supposed holder of an account that had been opened in its name to perpetrate fraud on it, and or that the
defendant is in cahoots with the supposed holder to perpetrate the name fraud.
The second
defendant had met the fourteenth
defendant who tasked him with the preparation of warehouses in Bahrain for storing weapons and explosives, which would be smuggled into Bahrain in addition to other explosives to be manufactured in Bahrain later.
"The
defendant contends that the judge improperly admitted, over his objection, testimony from Dudis on redirect examination that the
defendant's wife appeared at the scene of the scuffle outside the Big Y and purportedly slapped another loss prevention agent in the face.
Joshua Macktaz, who was not involved in the case, noted the judge's concern over the three-year time period during which the state had the ability to find the
defendant's correct address but failed to do so.
