darwinian evolution


Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Encyclopedia.
Related to darwinian evolution: Evolutionary Theory

dar·win·i·an ev·o·lu·tion

the proposition that the phylogeny of all species is wholly ascribable to the combined effects of random variation (mutation) in genotypes of the members of a stock as a result of the operation of undirected accidents with consequences to their phenotypes and the operation of preferential (but by no means certain) survival of those resulting phenotypes most suited to survive in the contemporary environment. The proposed system survives largely because of genetic factors that avidly conserve the ontogeny of the stock.

orthogenic evolution

An obsolete term referring to the evolution of biota based on intrinsic changes in the organisms’ genetic constitution, which contrasts to environmentally dependent (bathmic) evolution.

dar·win·i·an ev·o·lu·tion

(dahr-win'ē-ăn ev-ŏ-lū'shŭn)
The proposition that the phylogeny of all species is wholly ascribable to random variation (mutation) in genotypes and the operation of preferential survival of those resulting phenotypes most suited to survive in the contemporary environment.
Mentioned in ?
References in periodicals archive ?
Meyer doesn't reject Darwinian evolution. He only rejects it as a sufficient theory of life as we know it.
GIVING UP DARWIN
The important existential ethic of Darwinian evolution is passive adaptation and if no such adaptation is possible, then the species opt for another extreme i.e.
Shaw as an Evolutionist in Arms and the Man
Darwinists now have many websites in which the experts gush about how wonderful Darwinian evolution is and the laymen (invariably less informed than Nagel) gush back about how wonderfully clear the experts have made evolutionary theory to them, dispelling all doubt and rendering the theory obligatory for all clear thinking people, so that only those wedded to a religious fundamentalism could doubt it.
Defecting from Darwinian naturalism: about a decade ago I would muse on what it might take for intelligent design to win the day. Clearly, its intellectual and scientific project needed to move forward, and, happily, that has been happening
Not to science, because it is incompetent (according to Nobel Laureate Medawar), nor to Darwinian evolution, because it is superstition, according to Prof Hoyle.
Charles Darwin and his apostles have go it all wrong! Professor Felix I D Konotey-Ahulu (pictured below) uses this review of Dr Carl Wieland's new book, One Human Family--The Bible, Science, Race, and Culture, to elaborate his own position on Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution, racism and science
"We also think these fibres may have played a role on the early earth where they could have been the first entities subject to Darwinian evolution."
Cardiff scientists make Alzheimer's discovery; NEWS IN BRIEF
He begins by stating that evolution "could not help but undermine many of the core beliefs of a predominantly Anglican society," and that "it was not uncommon for someone who accepted Darwinian evolution to experience a profound crisis of faith" (pp.
Of Apes and Ancestors: Evolution, Christianity, and the Oxford Debate
"Business has taken its cue from Darwinian evolution theory, or survival of the fittest.
Businesses urged to boost co-operation
Showing Darwinian evolution theory to be only half of the evolutionary picture, while dominating economic theory, Dr Sahtouris will share why cooperation is as much a part of evolution as competition and very much on the immediate human agenda.
'Change your ways' says futurist as Bahrain gets ready for money talk
But Darwinian Evolution, being a natural process, is itself subject to the principle of least action.
COMMENT: Don't understand me too quickly -Munir Attaullah
Applying principles of Darwinian evolution to an immortal spirit?
What a lot of tosh; You Say Email:letters@liverpoolecho.co.uk
Proponents of intelligent design claim the Cambrian explosion of 545 million years ago, when the body plans of the ancestors of most animals developed, occurred too rapidly be explained by the gradual process of Darwinian evolution. Biologists Mark Farmer and Andrea Habura point out in their paper that unicellular protistan evolution lasted 1 billion years, providing the genomic diversity from which multicellular organisms arose during that remarkably fertile period.
When amoebas evolve: Myths of creationism
Q: Do scientists agree that Darwinian evolution is correct?
Is Darwinian evolution scientific? An interview with Eugene G. Windchy

Medical browser ?
Full browser ?