At
bimanual pelvic examination, it was possible to palpate the pedicle of the lesion through the cervical os.
A fixed pelvic mass located posteriorly to the uterus, which is not mobile during a
bimanual pelvic examination, should also give the clinician a suspicion of a retroperitoneal pathology and a need for more definitive imaging techniques, such as MRI, other than pelvic ultrasonography.
On
bimanual pelvic examination Uterus was about 12 to 14 weeks in size, soft and tender.
The
bimanual pelvic examination revealed the slightly enlarged soft uterus and tender palpable mass, about 4 cm in diameter in front of the uterus.
During
bimanual pelvic examination, a large, solid, irregular, fixed pelvic mass was found which occupied the whole pelvis.
The uterus and adnexum could not be assessed on
bimanual pelvic examination. The serum cancer antigen (CA)-125 level was elevated (363.5 IU/ml, normal range <35 IU/ml).
Bimanual pelvic examination as well as speculum examination to exclude pelvic organ prolapse should be performed.
*
Bimanual pelvic examination (45% and 90%, respectively)
I don't think we honestly can say that using a
bimanual pelvic examination.
The
bimanual pelvic examination has not been proved to make any difference to women's health in the long run.
Inspection, speculum examination and
bimanual pelvic examination were done.
Farah Farzaneh et al (2) reported a multiparous Iranian women who presented with yellow purulent vaginal discharge since 3 months and on
bimanual pelvic examination under general anesthesia revealed a 4 x 5 cm mass apparently arising from the anterior lip of the cervix, producing yellow vaginal discharge, the size of uterus was around 10 weeks pregnancy.