approach-avoidance conflict

ap·proach-a·void·ance con·flict

a situation of indecision and vacillation in which an individual is confronted with a single object or event that has both attractive and unattractive qualities. See: ambivalence.

approach-avoidance conflict

a conflict resulting from the presence of a single goal or desire that is both desirable and undesirable. See also conflict.

approach-avoidance conflict

Psychology An intrapersonal conflict characterized by both attraction towards and repulsion from something

ap·proach-avoid·ance con·flict

(ă-prōchă-voydăns konflikt)

State of indecision and vacillation in which someone is confronted with a single object or event with both attractive and unattractive qualities.

approach-avoidance conflict

a state of behavioural ambiva lence with respect to a goal.

Mentioned in ?

References in periodicals archive ?

For instance, the images employed in the current experiments as aversive and appetitive unconditioned and consequential stimuli may simply have been too weak to generate an approach-avoidance conflict that is characterized by the absence of responses and/or erratic responding across probe trials.

Furthermore, it would allow for the observation of any physiological arousal produced by the approach-avoidance conflict trials and allow for the comparison of anxiety levels during conflict and non-conflict trials.

Importantly, one dimension of real-world fear and anxiety that has yet to be subjected to experimental analysis is the role of approach-avoidance conflicts in the behavioral repertoire of the anxious client.

A derived relations analysis of approach-avoidance conflict: implications for the behavioral analysis of human anxiety

Therefore, to the extent that this approach-avoidance conflict model applies, appetitive and aversive motivational constructs are particularly useful to understanding substance abuse.

Other therapeutic interventions for reducing impulsive behavior include those that perhaps enhance the development of an approach-avoidance conflict in the presence of rewarding stimuli.

Similarly, given that there is some evidence of BIS activation among at least a subset of those who misuse substances, therapeutic strategies that attempt to work with the resultant approach-avoidance conflict or ambivalence might be especially helpful for increasing the salience of aversive outcomes associated with continued substance use (e.

Temperament, reward and punishment sensitivity, and clinical disorders: Implications for behavioral case formulation and therapy