amalgam restoration

Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Encyclopedia.

a·mal·gam res·to·ra·tion

(ă-malgăm restŏr-āshŭn)
A dental restoration made of an alloy of an element or metal with mercury.
See: amalgam, restoration
Synonym(s): silver filling.
Medical Dictionary for the Dental Professions © Farlex 2012
References in periodicals archive ?
Absence of carious lesions at margins of glass-ionomer cement and amalgam restorations: An update of systematic review evidence.
No evidence that bonding is needed for amalgam restorations. Evid Based Dent.2017 June 23;18(2):45.
Older research shows that amalgam restorations routinely last longer than composite, exhibiting better wear, durability, and longevity.
This article describes a reduced-step approach for exchanging amalgam restorations with composite resins using a base of flowable bulk-fill resin as a dentin substitute in combination with a final layer of conventional composite resin to replace the enamel and achieve anatomically and esthetically acceptable results.
[11.] Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V, Leal SC, Oliveira LB, Bezerra AC, Bonecker M (2009) Absence of carious lesions at margins of glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations: a meta- analysis.
Marginal ditching and staining as a predictor of secondary caries around amalgam restorations: a clinical and microbiological study.
Aim: This was to evaluate the effect of different thicknesses of cavity walls on fracture strength of pulpotomized primary molar teeth with class II amalgam restorations. Methods: 80 carious extracted human primary molar teeth were selected for pulpotomy preparation.
Our study revealed that 41% of the respondents never used rubber dam in amalgam restorations, while 26% never used it in composite restorations.
However, due to increasing aesthetic concerns of the military population and public concerns over the safety of amalgam restorations due to the perceived effects of mercury, amalgam restorations may no longer be the consumer or provider restorative material of choice.
The Median Survival Time (MST) reported for class II amalgam restorations placed in three year olds was 11 months which rose to 44 months in 7 to 8 year olds [Holland et al., 1986].
Composite fillings overcome previous amalgam fillings because they are superior in esthetic and able to be bonded to enamel and dentin.1 There is less tooth structure loss in composite cavity preparation when compared to the placement of a similar amalgam restoration and it has been shown that there is strengthening of the remaining tooth structure after placement of composite resin restoration.2 Composite resin has also been shown to have low cusp fracture rates in crown build up restorations.3
Basic concepts of cavity preparation for amalgam restoration were introduced by Dr.