The intersection between fallacy of (a) transhumanistic and (b) bioconservative arguments opened debate about sociological and the biological structuration of the new-formed Global society, within the frame of the new reproductive relationship--reproduction of the genetic capital.
Why should we use the smartest or stronger genotype was explained by the transhumanistic position that is best-represented trough the ideological standing of Julian Savulescu.
one of the examples they refer to is the objection against the transhumanistic's supra prevention or preventing biomedicine.
a) Transhumanistic fallacy: Could Irrationality be operative in ethical debates?
From the transhumanistic view, irrationality is understood as epistemologically non-operative in case of reproductive human cloning.
(34) Both of the transhumanistic advocates perceived normal function and the "yuck factor" as well, as an unacceptable argument in enhancement debate.