negligence

(redirected from The Reasonable Person)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Legal, Financial, Encyclopedia.
Related to The Reasonable Person: Responsible Person

negligence

 [neg´lĭ-jens]
in law, the failure to do something that a reasonable person of ordinary prudence would do in a certain situation or the doing of something that such a person would not do. Negligence may provide the basis for a lawsuit when there is a legal duty, as the duty of a physician or nurse to provide reasonable care to patients and when the negligence results in damage to the patient.

negligence

[neg′lijens]
Etymology: L, negligentia, carelessness
(in law) the commission of an act that a prudent person would not have done or the omission of a duty that a prudent person would have fulfilled, resulting in injury or harm to another person. In particular, in a malpractice suit, a professional person is negligent if harm to a client results from such an act or such failure to act, but it must be proved that other prudent members of the same profession would ordinarily have acted differently under the same circumstances. Negligence may be misfeasance, malfeasance, or nonfeasance.

negligence

Medical malpractice The failure or alleged failure on the part of a physician or other health care provider to exercise ordinary, reasonable, usual, or expected care, prudence, or skill–that would usually and customarily be exercised by other reputable physicians treating similar Pts–in performing a legally recognized duty, resulting in forseeable harm, injury or loss to another; negligence may be an act of omission–ie, unintentional, or commission–ie, intentional, characterized by inattention, recklessness, inadvertence, thoughtlessness, or wantonness. See Adverse event, Comparative negligence, Contributory negligence, Gross negligence, Malpractice, Wanton negligence, Willful negligence. Cf Recklessness.
Negligence, required elements  
Duty A recognized relationship between Pt and physician
Breach Failure of a medical practitioner to practice in accordance with standard of care
Proximate cause The plaintiff must show that injury is reasonably connected to physician's action
Damages Plaintiff must show that alleged loss or damage has a quantifiable value such that a monetary payment can be made APLM 1997; 121:252

neg·li·gence

(neg'li-jĕns)
Failure to perform duties or activities with due diligence and attention or to meet the standards of regular care.

neg·li·gence

(neg'li-jĕns)
Failure to perform duties or activities with due diligence and attention or to meet the standards of regular care.

negligence (neg´lijəns),

n the failure to observe, for the protection of another person, the degree of care and vigilance that the circumstances demand, whereby such other person suffers injury.
negligence, contributory,
n negligence by an injured party that combines as a proximate cause with the negligence of the injurer in producing the injury. May bar recovery or mitigate damages.
negligence, imputed,
n the principle that places the responsibility for negligence on a person other than the one that was directly negligent. This transfer of responsibility is based on some special relationship of the parties, such as parent and child or principal and agent (e.g., a dental professional may be responsible for the negligence of a dental assistant).

negligence

in law, the failure to do something that a reasonable person of ordinary prudence would do in a certain situation or the doing of something that such a person would not do. Negligence may provide the basis for a lawsuit when there is a legal duty, as the duty of a veterinarian, to provide reasonable care to patients and when the negligence results in damage to the patient.

contributory negligence
a defense against a negligence suit, in which evidence is presented that the client contributed to the unsatisfactory outcome of a case by being negligent himself/herself, e.g. by not returning the animal for further treatment soon enough.
References in periodicals archive ?
The Court's reasonable person should resemble the average person described by the survey results; but the reasonable person does not resemble the average person.
The average person does not feel the way the Court believes a reasonable person would, even though the reasonable person in law should resemble the average person in reality.
The reasonable person standard is based on the behavior of an average member of the community balancing the costs and benefits of expenditures on care.
The reasonable person standard can also be written in terms of the first-order condition; that is, [x.
Let me illustrate how the reasonable person figure operates in
whether the judge would appear biased to the reasonable person.
Implied consent will exist if the reasonable person believes it is an expected part of the game.
Similar to a criminal charge, the court in a lawsuit will take into account the perspective of the reasonable person when deciding if a player has deliberately or recklessly injured another player.
In order to apply the reasonable person concept, the survey team must deter mine the severity of the psychosocial outcome or potential outcome the deficiency may have had on a reasonable person in the resident's position (i.
CMS uses the Reasonable Person Concept by defining it through this example: "What degree of actual or potential harm would one expect a reasonable person in a similar situation to suffer as a result of the noncompliance.
As practiced now in the American Way of Court, the Reasonable Person Doctrine actually asks the following: What would a reasonable and prudent person have done in the same situation, knowing exactly what the defendant knew?