If you vote for Clinton as the lesser of two evils
, you're compromising your moral values, you're condoning the IDemocratic Party's shoddy treatment of millions of progressives, and you're sabotaging future real change.
Is the question of voting for the lesser of two evils
a principled or pragmatic one?
More than half of Republicans (59%) would choose the Democrat they view as the lesser of two evils
as opposed to the one they think would be easier to beat.
If it is his medial ligament then that is the lesser of two evils
because the anterior cruciate ligament would be the worst case scenario.
342% per ounce of shoe weight--is, if not entirely negligible, the lesser of two evils
When Clinton succeeded in dismantling welfare to an extent that Republicans had only dreamed of, and radical queer activism virtually disappeared from the political landscape, I knew that I could never again vote for the lesser of two evils
Yes, this is about choosing the lesser of two evils
In such a case, the Catholic voter would have chosen the lesser of two evils
, which is morally permissible under these circumstances.
Sometimes that could mean choosing the lesser of two evils
in a bill.
Bush, Something books like these should be helping people to understand, instead of limiting their horizons to the electoral cycle and the lesser of two evils
Or maybe backing the lesser of two evils
would leave you feeling dirty.