Scientific creationists have failed to pass laws requiring the teaching of a version of science subservient to a particular religious viewpoint coequal to the teaching of evolution.
The scientific creationists demand that their scriptures are, using literal interpretations, scientific descriptions of nature while ignoring flat earth and other conflicting observations that are not supported by science or logic.
The scientific creationists want us to accept their idea that the earth was created 6-10 thousand years ago by criticizing evolution and avoiding the "creation research" that would overwhelmingly prove their point.
"Scientific Creationists," in their desperate attempts to rebut science with matching sophistication, have distorted, contorted, and falsified scientific data to conform to a biblical Procrustean bed.
To any but those who are convinced that their celestial rewards depend upon a slavish allegiance to the Bible's inerrancy, these axioms and corollaries comprise a reductio ad absurdum of "Scientific Creationism." Moreover, he subjects the reasoning of the "Scientific Creationists" to logical analysis and finds it replete with fallacies: undistributed middle terms, affirming consequents, false analogies.