Should preponderance of evidence
be the proof standard in these cases?
But the standard for sentencing is a preponderance of evidence
And in a 2006 report, the Guttmacher Institute found that "the preponderance of evidence
from well-designed and well-executed studies indicates that abortion .
Risk of death was related to CD4 count but not feeding method, (1) The preponderance of evidence
is that HIV-positive women are not compromised by breastfeeding and as formula-fed infants are more likely to die of causes other than HIV, replacement feeding has not reduced the overall risk of infant mortality.
But despite a growing preponderance of evidence
that optimal glycemic control is essential, many diabetes patients still do not achieve and/or maintain optimal glucose levels as recommended by major professional associations.
However, the preponderance of evidence
does not support abandoning current standards and regulations as explained in our recent commentary.
The resulting Supreme Court certification was limited solely to establishing the appropriate standard of proof for an IFPA violation, and the Court determined that the standard was "a preponderance of evidence
," the least demanding of the three evidentiary standards (preponderance of evidence
, clear and convincing evidence, and proof beyond a reasonable doubt).
The Workers' Compensation Commission found that Nurse Holland failed to prove by a preponderance of evidence
that she sustained a compensable injury for which her employer was responsible.
In 1771, Londoners bet nearly 60,000 pounds on whether French diplomat Charles de Beaumont was male or female; though de Beaumont declined to furnish definitive proof, a judge ruled that the preponderance of evidence
The preponderance of evidence
suggests that the warming of the past 50 years has mostly come from greenhouse gas emissions and everything we're seeing in the Arctic is 100 percent consistent with that," says Robert Corell, a senior fellow at the American Meteorological Society in Washington, D.
It decided that if a worker proves by a preponderance of evidence
that sex was a motivating factor in the employer's decision or action, the worker is entitled to damages, even when the employer also is motivated by lawful reasons, unless the employer can demonstrate that it would have treated the worker similarly had gender played no role.