Predatory Pricing

Also found in: Dictionary, Financial, Wikipedia.
An unethical health insurance pricing structure, in which groups and persons unlikely to use a particular covered service are charged a low premium; the premium rapidly increases as a consumer uses the service
Mentioned in ?
References in periodicals archive ?
While the Tribunal's conclusions are case specific, important conclusions concerning its future thinking on abuse of dominance and predatory pricing under the Competition Act can be drawn from its decision.
A successful predatory pricing case under Brooke Group requires showing that American priced below its cost, and also that American stood a reasonable chance of recovering the resulting losses.
One consistent theme throughout the evolution of the airline industry since deregulation has been the charge leveled by smaller carriers that the major network carriers are practicing predatory pricing, and exhibiting other predatory behaviors, in an attempt to limit competition [Velocci 1995; Dempsey 1997].
This Note explores weaknesses in the current doctrinal approach to predatory pricing claims, as well as the underlying economic theory that seems to animate it, by focusing on the "recoupment" element of the current predatory pricing test.
There is a huge literature on predatory pricing now.
Predatory pricing in the NIO arises when a dominant firm can credibly signal that it will price below cost if anyone enters the market.
Blockbuster's Raskopf denied the predatory pricing allegation, adding, ``Our goal is most assuredly not to drive prices down; it is to make sure we're priced competitively.
In editorials and the Page One 'Attack of the Evil Empire" story that ran under a five-column headline, Chronicle editor and co-owner Jerry Bellune accused the State of unfair business practices, including predatory pricing.
As it is described by neoclassical economics, the dumper is the firm that enforces a predatory pricing policy on a certain market, with the aim of cutting off competition.
Therefore, it was determined that JCR had prima facie abused its dominant positionby engaging in predatory pricing which is a violation of Section 3 of the Competition Act, 2010.
First, tests for predatory pricing should reflect an optimal balance of deterrence of anticompetitive predation while minimizing the chilling of procompetitive price competition, whether or not this maximizes the accuracy of the tests.
These deals latter allowed the Latvian airline to engage in predatory pricing and anticompetitive behaviour which eventually forced FlyLAL out of certain markets.