In Figure 2b, I've added some volume to the Necker cube, fleshed it out a bit.
Nevertheless, the Necker cube does have its limitations as an iconic sign-vehicle that could give full expression to Being.
So the transpermeation of subject and object characteristic of Being cannot fully be delivered by a dimensionally inadequate sign-vehicle like the Necker cube.
The Necker Cube Test is a simple, two-part assessment easily adaptable to the clinical setting.
A normal score on the Necker Cube Test is -47, with a standard deviation of 25.
The Necker Cube, CPT, and VAS are, however, able to capture the subtle changes in DA (i.
There does not appear to be any alternative way to describe the Necker cube phenomenon that is nearly as clear and concise as Figure 1.
As with the Necker cube example, it appears that massively parallel models constitute the best way to carry out the encoding.
The two alternative coalitions are quite similar to the two readings of the Necker cube.
The Necker Cube demonstration in fact was motivated by this very fact (and this was done in the 1980's).
When my perception, or perspective, of the Necker Cube changes it is disorienting.
18) A good example of the former is the conscious shifting of one's perspective of the Necker Cube.