The study found that procedural and
distributive justice indicated significant and positive relationship with employee work outcomes of organizational commitment and job satisfaction.
Matt Matravers contradicts the commonly accepted claim that the Rawlsian approach to
distributive justice should not be applied to retributive justice.
But this has nothing to do with
distributive justice.
Hence, I wrote, Similarly, Professor Finn misstated
distributive justice, writing: "
Distributive justice requires that actions and institutions related to owning and using the goods of the earth must ensure that the needs of all are met." Again the Catechism corrects this:
distributive justice "regulates what the community owes its citizens in proportion to their contributions and needs." In other words,
distributive justice applies to common, i.e., jointly owned goods, not all goods.
They drew on the Rawlsian ideas of
distributive justice, need, maximin theory, and the principle of redress to promote humane management in the context of scarce resources.
(19) Regardless of the version of the EER thesis, all such approaches treat mitigation as fundamentally a
distributive justice problem that requires egalitarian distributive principles in order to solve.
Scholars of philosophy generally follow the work of John Rawls on
distributive justice, but some explain how they depart from his notions.
DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE AND CONSTITUTIONAL TORTS 1775 A.
A central way to do so is by offering equitable outcomes (i.e.,
distributive justice) and enacting fair policies and procedures (i.e., procedural justice) (Colquitt et al, 2005).
This last point is important, because where the equality entailed by commutative justice is absolute, taking no account of the particular circumstances or attributes of the persons involved,
distributive justice seeks a proportionate equality.