Age Discrimination

(redirected from Disparate Impact)
Also found in: Legal, Financial, Wikipedia.

Age Discrimination

Geriatrics A bias or belief that may be held by a health care provider that depression, forgetfulness, and other disorders are a normal part of ageing and that older individuals won’t benefit from treatment of mental disorders.
Social medicine Discrimination against or unfair treatment of individuals on the basis of their age.
Psychiatry Systematic stereotyping of and discrimination against the elderly to distance oneself from their social plight and skirt personal fears of ageing and death.
MedspeakUK Any overt or covert policy or act that adversely affects a worker because of his/her age.
MedspeakUS The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 provides that no person in the US shall, on the basis of age, be denied the benefits of, be excluded from participation in, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
References in periodicals archive ?
To do this, HUD is proposing to add five elements that must be included in disparate impact claims under the FHA.
Beyond simplicity, what is the case for unifying disparate impact law?
Moreover, even if Marcotte opted-in to the collective action only to pursue her disparate impact claim, while continuing to pursue her disparate treatment claim in her individual action, that would still constitute improper claim-splitting as these claims arise out of the same subject matterdefendants' alleged discrimination in failing to re-hire her as an ITS.
Floyd said that under disparate impact theory, plaintiffs must show a causal connection between the challenged policy and the impact on a protected class, and that the families in this case appeared to have done this.
On APRIL 4TH, 2016, HUD published new guidance that marked a significant change in HUD's expectations for compliance with the FHA's disparate impact rule.
leave policies had a disparate impact on pregnant employees, but most
As to the disparate impact claim, the Eleventh Circuit, sitting en banc, examined the pertinent section of the statute, which makes it "unlawful for an employer to limit, segregate, or classify his employees in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee, because of such individual's age." After an exposition in statutory construction, the Court held that the plain language of this statutory text covers only discrimination against employees, not applicants for employment, and that Congress had not provided a remedy to applicants who are not employees when alleged discrimination occurred.
The FHA prohibits discrimination in housing based on "race, color, religion, sex, familial status, or national origin." (10) In 2013, the Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") issued a regulation that formalized a three-part burden-shifting test (11) to prove disparate impact liability under the FHA.
Soon after Griggs, Congress revisited Title VII and tacitly ratified disparate impact as grounds for employer liability.
(67) Eventually, each circuit that "directly address[ed] the issue...allowed disparate impact claims under the FHA." (68) However, despite the unanimity, the Supreme Court held off on deciding the issue one way or another.
Toomey questioned the agency's use of disparate impact, stating it was applying a novel new approach.
First, disparate impact claims may now be brought against lenders under an additional provision of the FHA.