Cipollone v. Liggett Group

A ‘landmark’ product-liability action against cigarette manufacturers filed by Mrs. Rose Cipollone in 1983 that resulted in a trial by jury and an award of $400,000 to her estate
References in periodicals archive ?
Supreme Court's decision in Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., which held that the FCLAA expressly preempted only some actions under state law.
It was also a victory for Justice Stevens, whose careful opinion in an earlier case, Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., (12) has been transformed by the pesticide industry and the lower courts into a mandate for FIFRA preemption.
(142.) See Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 505 U.S.
Supreme Court examined the preemption effect of federal legislation on state claims based on cigarette packaging, advertising and promotion in Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 505 U.S.
(Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 893 F.2d 541 (3d Cir.
After Mortier, in Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., the Supreme Court described federal preemption analysis as follows:
In the 1992 decision Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., the U.S.