equivalence

(redirected from Biconditional)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Encyclopedia.

e·quiv·a·lence

, equivalency (ē-kwiv'ă-lens, -len-sē),
1. The property of an element or radical of combining with or displacing, in definite and fixed proportion, another element or radical in a compound.
2. The point in a precipitin test at which antibody and antigen are present in optimal proportions.
[L. aequus, equal, + valentia, strength (valence)]

e·quiv·a·lence

, equivalency (ē-kwiv'ă-lĕns, -lĕn-sē)
The property of an element or radical of combining with or displacing, in definite and fixed proportion, another element or radical in a compound.
[L. aequus, equal, + valentia, strength (valence)]

equivalence

(ē-kwĭv′ă-lĕns) [″ + valere, to be worth]
The quality of being equal in power, potency, force, value, or clinical effectiveness.
References in periodicals archive ?
[A] is true iff [F(A)) was true iff [P(A)] will be true, where the assumption is that in the second and third elements of the biconditionals the tensed truth predicate succeeds in "cancelling" the tensed operator, in effect returning us to the statement made by the original sentence.
Can counterexamples like this be avoided by placing a different construal on the biconditional? For reasons to be given in [section] VII, I regard this as an unpromising avenue to follow, especially when set alongside an alternative.
On such an account, which bears some analogies to my analysis of the Liar paradox (Koons 1992), the Tarski biconditionals all come out as true:
Unless condition (ii) is met, the provisoed biconditional will be insubstantial, and so will need no explanation.
Next, we might wonder whether the biconditional formulation is appropriate here--whether not having to cross immigration checkpoints is a "discretionary benefit" for the purposes of the doctrine.
EXPERIMENT 2: DIRECTIONAL EFFECT ON CONDITIONAL AND BICONDITIONAL PROBLEMS
Our assumption is that these conditionals are indeed semantically equivalent in the sense that both are usually interpreted as biconditional (Espino et al., 2013; Montolio, 2000).
In brief, in this paper we are assuming that except if has a biconditional meaning and that it describes exceptive possibility more precisely than the conditional unless.
uninterpretable features, the relevant connection between these being captured in the biconditional in (c) immediately below:
Nor is the problem avoided if we water-down (K1) and (K2) to conditional rather than biconditional or material equivalence formulations.