Ranson's score requires lots of variables raising cost of complete diagnosis and management whereas BISAP
score has less variables which are cost effective and can be done in emergency setting.
The patients who underwent a contrast enhanced CT scan within 72 hours of onset of AP and had all the workup available for calculation of BISAP
score were included.
As shown in Figure 2, the AUCs for BMI at admission, hematocrit at admission, HDL-C at admission, BUN at admission, BUN after 24 hrs of admission, Scr at admission, Scr after 24 hrs of admission, BISAP
score, and LR model for the prediction of SAP were 0.56 [+ or -] 0.04, 0.60 [+ or -] 0.04, 0.76 [+ or -] 0.04, 0.75 [+ or -] 0.04, 0.79 [+ or -] 0.04, 0.67 [+ or -] 0.05, 0.76 [+ or -] 0.04, 0.82 [+ or -] 0.03, and 0.84 [+ or -] 0.03, respectively.
score was 1 based on the presence of SIRS criteria.
score among these patients were calculated and tabulated as follows [Tab.
In multivariable analysis adjusting for the potential confounding influences of respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure, BISAP
score, hematocrit, bicarbonate, and BUN, many of these associations weakened noticeably.
Comparison of Ranson, Glasgow, MOSS, SIRS, BISAP
, APACHE-II, CTSI Scores, IL-6, CRP, and Procalcitonin in Predicting Severity, Organ Failure, Pancreatic Necrosis, and Mortality in Acute Pancreatitis.
Liang, "Comparison of the BISAP
scores for predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis in Chinese patients according to the latest Atlanta classification," Journal ofHepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences, vol.
The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation scale (APACHE II), Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP
), Ranson's criteria, Glasgow criteria, and computed tomography severity index are risk stratification systems for the prediction of the clinical course and prognosis of AP.
Our primary concern is that one of the outcomes (severity of HP) was defined by the scores calculated (Ranson, APACHE II, BISAP
, and MCTSI scores).