Asymetric Warfare

(redirected from Asymmetric warfare)
Also found in: Dictionary, Wikipedia.
Warfare in which opposing combatants have markedly different military capabilities and the weaker side uses non-standard tactics such as terrorism, suicide bombing and stealth
Segen's Medical Dictionary. © 2012 Farlex, Inc. All rights reserved.
References in periodicals archive ?
Now the threat against energy assets from Iran and its proxies in terms of asymmetric warfare through the use of drones is only growing.
* Contributing to soldier capability development through the work of the Asymmetric Warfare Group
The book is for advanced students and scholars interested in empire, decolonization, and asymmetric warfare. ([umlaut] Ringgold, Inc., Portland, OR)
Asymmetric warfare by its very nature leads combatants on all sides to develop new weapons and defenses.
Another key advantage of our equipment is its ability to detect unexpected chemical threats in an asymmetric warfare scenario, no matter which is the type of gas used or the location of its dispersal, he adds.
The book authored by a former Commander of the Navy, Admiral (Retd) Dr Jayanath Colombage, "Asymmetric warfare at sea," was launched recently at the Admiral Somathilake Dissanayaka Auditorium, Naval Headquarters.
Asymmetric warfare rather than conventional force superiority was the new guiding principle for Iran, where tactics, techniques and procedures became more important than the performance parameters of equipment itself.
Bahrain: Iran has been accused of using asymmetric warfare to assert its powers in the region much like techniques used by extremist groups.
Russia is engaged in "classic asymmetric warfare" in Syria by propping up President Bashar al-Assad while saying it is attacking Islamic State militants, Britain's foreign minister said on Sunday.
This reality also brings into question the military's failure in procuring arms and vehicles necessary in the fight against terrorism as well as its inadequacy in the fight against asymmetric warfare.
Weaknesses include sloppy editing, lack of attention to the details of its presentation, weak positioning of the main arguments in the context of pertinent research literature, and, most importantly, a shaky foundation within the framework of the over-hyped, but analytically feeble concept of "asymmetric warfare."
Asymmetric Warfare: A State vs Non-State Conflict *
Full browser ?