appeal

(redirected from Appellate review)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Legal, Financial, Encyclopedia.

ap·peal

(ă-pēl')
In health care accounting, denotes a request from a physician or clerical worker in a health care facility for a third-party payer to reconsider a decision about a disallowed claim for compensation.
References in periodicals archive ?
Appellate review was sought, but the survivor, who had no counsel at the trial court level, had no appellate counsel.
Luckily, the Supreme Court granted review and ultimately reversed the Court of Appeals, holding that "a motion for a new trial is not required to preserve objections to pretrial orders that decide motions in limine for appellate review." (Opinion at 2.) The court made clear that evidentiary and other "procedural" issues raised pretrial did not need to be included in a motion for a new trial because raising the issues before trial allowed the District Court an opportunity to fully consider and reflect upon the parties' arguments, which differed from the evidentiary issues arising during trial.
(13) In Biard, the Court held that denials of motions to dismiss for FNC do not fall within the collateral order doctrine--a narrow exception to the final judgment rule that permits appellate review of certain interlocutory orders.
Accordingly, this article seeks to place the right to appeal a criminal conviction in comparative perspective by contrasting civil law and common law approaches to appellate review. So as to allow for a meaningful comparison, Section II will put the primary aspects of appellate review at second instance in relation to the most serious crimes recognised in a domestic legal order side by side, (11) on the basis of a sufficiently wide and geographically diverse sample of common law jurisdictions (12) and civil law jurisdictions (13) Subsequently, Section III will identify the underlying reasons for such divergences.
It consolidates the chapter on appellate review with the chapter on offering and opposing evidence.
He also appeals an order of the trial court denying his motion for postconviction relief.<br />Compton raises six issues on appeal: (1) that he was not properly informed of the charge against him; (2) that the recordspecifically, transcripts from the proceedingscontain "[n]umerous errors and omissions"; (3) that his arrest was unlawful and the custodial statement he made was inadmissible; (4) that the State committed a Brady violation and other discovery violations; (5) that the trial court relied on inaccurate information at sentencing; and (6) that his trial counsel was ineffective because he failed to provide Compton with his trial level case file for appellate review. We affirm<br />Full Text<br />[box type="shadow" ]<br />Attorney Derek A.
In other words, without recall, Persky would "get away with it."<br />Political choices<br />The solution is not to broaden the scope of appellate review. Appellate courts should not be second-guessing such judgments because of (in the oft-used phrase) "an absence of judicially manageable standards" for them to apply.
Federal officials are expected to review the decision in 2020.<br />The Western Watersheds Project filed its appeal with the Interior Board of Land Appeals, an appellate review panel that issues final decisions for the U.S.
He said that jurisdiction over declaratory relief "is vested in the regional trial court" and the SC's jurisdiction "is limited to appellate review of Declaratory Relief judgments rendered by the trial courts."
'Its jurisdiction is limited to appellate review of declaratory relief judgments rendered by the trial courts,' the SC declared.
(45) If, after entry of judgment, the convening authority acts to reduce, commute, or suspend a sentence due to the accused's substantial assistance, she must forward this action "to the chief trial judge for appropriate modification of the entry of judgment, which shall be transmitted to The Judge Advocate General (TJAG) for appropriate action." (46) It is only after the entry of judgment that an accused may waive or withdraw from appellate review. (47)