In Tables 3 and 4, Alg1, Alg2, Alg3
, Alg4, Alg5, and Alg6 indicate PF pruning bagging with unpruned C4.5, bagging with unpruned C4.5, PF pruning bagging with pruned C4.5, bagging with pruned C4.5, PF pruning random forest, and random forest.
Since Algorithm 3 (Alg3) does not need to perform the bisection search, the complexity reduces to O([OMEGA]N), which is much less complex than O([OEMGA]N [log.sub.2] (1/[epsilon])) of Alg2.
Following the similar methods for solving P1 in section 3, we can obtain optimal algorithm for solving P5 similar to Alg2 and suboptimal algorithm similar to Alg3. We denote Alg2 and Alg3 for solving P5 as Alg2' and Alg3', respectively (2).
Proposition 1: [P.sub.out] is a strictly decreasing function of the dual variable p if Alg2' or Alg3' is applied.
As for Alg3', since W(x) is a increasing function of x for x [greater than or equal to] 0 , [P.sub.n] is a decreasing function of [mu] according to (20).
Algorithm 4: The power allocation with CDI 1: Obtain [P.sub.n] by applying Alg2' or Alg3'.
It is also seen that the aggregate BER achieved by Alg2 is smaller than that achieved by Alg3. In addition, it is observed that the three reference algorithms achieve very similar aggregate BER levels for small [bar.I].
For the purpose of comparison, results of Alg2 and Alg3 with perfect CSI are also given.
This intermediate is then flipped from the cytosol to the rER lumen, where synthesis proceeds by GTs Alg3
, Alg9, Alg12, Alg6, Alg8, and Alg10 that use the dolichol-linked sugars Dol-PP-Glc and Dol-PP-Man as donors to synthesize the glycan precursor Dol-PP-GlcN[Ac.sub.2] [Man.sub.9] [Glc.sub.3].