standard of proof


Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Legal, Financial, Encyclopedia.

standard of proof

The legal standard in the UK which guides courts on General Medical Council (GMC)-related matters and is based on the “balance of probabilities” of civil law. Before 2008, such matters were decided on the criminal standard of “beyond reasonable doubt”.
References in periodicals archive ?
I really think our disagreement is about whether it is permissible to put a legal burden of proof on a claimant, and whether that necessarily dictates what I call the standard of proof.
The appeals officer on the matter told Gubser that the IRS could prove willfulness by a preponderance of the evidence, but not by clear and convincing evidence, and asked for guidance regarding the proper standard of proof.
It seems that in the end the standard of proof applied by the Court is nothing else but the "beyond reasonable doubt" that is typical of international criminal law.
22) The law says to proceed element-by-element and apply the standard of proof to each element, not to create holistic stories and compare them.
As a result of the wide variety of enabling Acts (3) that give jurisdiction to SAT, a slightly different emphasis is discernable in the Tribunal's conduct of proceedings in regard to the burden of proof and the standard of proof.
254) Nor can subjective probability assessments involved in judging whether a standard of proof has been met generally be declared "wrong" simply because they are based in part on objective data, where available, or because of the precise relationship between that data and the individualized, unique decision being made.
specify the standard of proof necessary to overcome this presumption of
The judge might not clearly state, or the jury might not fully understand, the proper element-by-element approach to the standard of proof.
Part V sets forth an argument that the autism test cases demonstrate how the current standard of proof in vaccine cases trends too much toward awarding compensation and away from science.
However, in a 1950 case Lord Denning made it clear that, within the civil formula, variations in subject matter or in allegations may affect the standard of proof required: there are various bands of seriousness and, correspondingly, various degrees of proof.
21) The district court rejected Microsoft's proposal for a varying standard of proof and instructed the jury that Microsoft had the burden of proving invalidity by clear and convincing evidence.
Microsoft attorneys argued the standard of proof should be lower than what was applied by the lower courts under their precedent.

Full browser ?