standard of proof


Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Legal, Financial, Encyclopedia.

standard of proof

The legal standard in the UK which guides courts on General Medical Council (GMC)-related matters and is based on the “balance of probabilities” of civil law. Before 2008, such matters were decided on the criminal standard of “beyond reasonable doubt”.
References in periodicals archive ?
71) Since the justification must be made to another to a sufficient degree to persuade them to invoke the state's power, the standard of proof ensures accountability.
regarding the proper standard of proof for finding a patent invalid.
Or, because humans might tend to construct a story for the whole case rather than proceeding element-by-element, the fact-finder might end up applying the standard of proof to the conjoined elements.
However, in a 1950 case Lord Denning made it clear that, within the civil formula, variations in subject matter or in allegations may affect the standard of proof required: there are various bands of seriousness and, correspondingly, various degrees of proof.
21) The district court rejected Microsoft's proposal for a varying standard of proof and instructed the jury that Microsoft had the burden of proving invalidity by clear and convincing evidence.
Now when looking at allegations of child sexual abuse, the diocese will use "sufficiently confirmed" as its standard of proof instead of "moral certitude.
Not once, so far as we (and Microsoft) are aware, has it even considered a proposal to lower the standard of proof .
The standard of proof is used to determine whether factual allegations against a registrant have been proved.
HSE deputy chief executive Sandra Caldwell said their review was conducted to the higher standard of proof "beyond all reasonable doubt" while the commission looked at evidence on a "balance of probabilities".
Quantitative sensitivity analysis is a standard of proof used for evaluating mathematical and computational models.
Most states have settled on "a preponderance of evidence" as the standard of proof, but in Georgia, it's "beyond a reasonable doubt.
The Court wrote, "To recognize a third verdict in the criminal trial process would, in effect, create two classes of people: those found to be factually innocent and those who benefited from the presumption of innocence and the high standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

Full browser ?