pretrial discovery


Also found in: Legal.

pretrial discovery

See discovery.
Mentioned in ?
References in periodicals archive ?
She said federal law didn't guarantee such privacy in pretrial discovery of evidence.
7) The central role of computers and electronic storage systems in today's business environment (and society at large) has driven exponential growth in the volume of ESI, (8) which in turn has increased costs and delays in the pretrial discovery process.
73) Others have called for a focus beyond the trial, to "new ways to ensure accuracy other than adversarial scrutiny and the incentives arising from trials and bargaining," including expansion of pretrial discovery, direct improvements in the quality of investigation, and "increasing the involvement of the judicial branch" in pretrial rather than trial-centered activities.
Supreme Court, include language intended to narrow the scope of pretrial discovery to ensure demands are "proportional" to the needs of a particular case.
Massachusetts Rule of Criminal Procedure 14 outlines proper procedure and scope of pretrial discovery in criminal cases based on the concept of reciprocity.
29) Thus, United States pretrial discovery is litigant managed and judicially enforced.
The new law should increase the number of criminal prosecutions, because in addition to creating a financial incentive for plaintiffs to turn in lawyers and case runners who make illegal offers, Edwards said lawyers like him can provide criminal evidence, collected during pretrial discovery hearings in civil suits, to prosecutors and the State Bar of Texas.
The investigation also serves as a means of pretrial discovery for the accused and defense counsel in copies of the criminal investigation and witness statements are provided and witnesses who testify may be cross-examined, it said.
Part 2 treats pretrial matters, with three chapters on the criminal justice process, pretrial discovery, and the exclusionary rule and motions to suppress evidence.
In many cases what each of the parties may be allowed to elicit from the opposing party is determined during the pretrial discovery process.
You have also explained that pretrial discovery orders are considered "nonfinal" and "interlocutory" and therefore not appealable as a matter of right.