originate

(redirected from originative)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Legal, Financial, Idioms.

o·rig·i·nate

(ə-rĭj′ə-nāt′)
v.
1. To bring into being; create.
2. To come into being; start.

Patient discussion about originate

Q. At what age can alcoholism begin? My son is 13. He drinks too much. every day he drinks, sometimes more than one time each day. can it be alcoholism already, so young? what can I do to stop this?

A. I agree with all the answers that have been given to you, stop being a friend & start being a parent, thats a start, getting him in somewhere before it's too late is the second step, you don't it will only get worse, pretending the talk will do it, no way it won't, no matter what in the end he will thank you & always be your son & friend but you as the parent have to get him professional help now, I wouldn't wait. Donna

Q. where does the chinese medicine origin from?

A. from trial and error of 5000 years...because the chines people are a very dedicated people- they perfected it to an art. not all the arguments they bring to the success of a treatment make sense, but if it works it doesn't really matters no? but then again- it also doesn't mean you should go and be a chines medicine freak..

Q. Why do litlle kids' nose's begin to bleed?

A. A nose starts to bleed when one of the small veins in its lining bursts. This is usually caused by something completely harmless, such as the child picking their nose, blowing it too hard or having their nose knocked while playing. Another reason could be that the child has pushed something inside their nose. Some children have veins that are closer to the mucous membrane of their nose than other children. Because the veins are very close to the skin, they are more likely to burst when the child picks, blows or rubs their nose, or plays rough games.

More discussions about originate
References in periodicals archive ?
The criterion of choice in originative decisions is direct preference for one set of consequences in comparison with the consequences of other courses of action.
On the other hand, in an originative decision, courses of action are compared with each other, so there must always be at least two courses.
Here's how the originative pattern works in very simple cases.
If we never made decisions in the originative pattern, it would be difficult to explain how we're able to decide among courses of action that involve consequences not previously contemplated and not covered by the goals we've selected earlier.
This line of argument can become involved and cannot in any event establish the existence of an originative pattern of decision making.
In the originative pattern, examination of the facts comes first, and a value judgment (direct preference) comes second.
Again, I'd like to add a few more short comments instead of going into more detail on the originative pattern.
The purely originative pattern is not very frequently used in making administrative decisions (although large scale decisions are partly goal-directed and partly originative, they fall on the continuum but not at either extreme).
And even if human behavior were partially attributable to some random element, that would do nothing to endow us with originative agenthood.
Our concept of moral responsibility need not rest on the myth of originative agency but only on the necessity for social order.