observer bias

observer bias

(ŏb-zĕr′vĕr) [″]
Distortions introduced into a research investigation by the expectations and/or knowledge of the individuals collecting the data.
Mentioned in ?
References in periodicals archive ?
Although observational studies of SMA have been criticized for lacking experimental power, to be subject to observer bias, and involve relatively simple measurement techniques, they do provide insight into the spatial behaviour of free-roaming animals in their natural environment, allow observers to collect large amounts of data, and do not require specialized equipment and facilities typically associated with laboratory studies of animal behaviour (Begall et al.
Yes, 235 ways scientists can fool themselves, with sober names such as confounding, selection bias, recall bias, reporting bias, ascertainment bias, sex bias, cognitive bias, measurement bias, verification bias, publication bias, observer bias, and on and on.
To solve the problem of observer bias all tests were carried by a single person to avoid inter-observer variations of test interpretation.
The weakness of our study is inter observer bias and technical constraints in radiology department due to which we were not able to follow the society of fetal urology grading system of congenital hydronephrosis and we used more subjective grading system based upon renal AP diameter7.
Part two discusses different types of research designs, including survey, experimental, case study, ethnography, and action research, with part three honing in on the specific data collection techniques of questionnaires, individual and group interviews, observation, and document analysis, as well as discussing how the Internet can be used to facilitate participant recruitment, questionnaire administration, reduction of observer bias, and other aspects of research.
This assumption is sometimes violated (Chen 1999, 2000) and information regarding heterogeneity in observer bias should be modeled (Graham and Bell 1989) because it can produce negatively biased estimates.
This policy was adopted to decrease the possibility of any observer bias.
There is also the risk of observer bias (the authors are all employees of the company that performed the testing) and participant bias (the subjects are all clients of the company and knew that they were being interviewed by a representative of the company).
There is also the risk of observer bias (the authors are all employees of the company that performed the testing) and participant bias (the subjects are clients of the company and knew that they were being interviewed by a representative of the company).
This second approach resulted in a decreased sample size but allowed for assessment of observer bias associated with prior knowledge of bat presence.
Evaluation of vessel selection and observer bias is based on a formal review of bias in NMFS observer programs (Volstad and Fogarty (2)).
In the 1940s photomultiplier tubes were able to convert starlight into a measurable electric current, largely removing observer bias from the process of determining brightnesses.