References in periodicals archive ?
4], and let G([lambda] (l)), H([lambda] (l)),K([lambda] (l)), A(l),B(l),C(l) be as in Lemmas 1 and 2.
There are objections that the second lemma is either too broad or too narrow.
One of the main ideas to prove the main theorem is to use Lemmas 2.
The first lemmas to be generalized for the interested reader are Lemmas 2 and 3, because a nondegenerate singular curve C [subset] [P.
n)])] is r-convex function, for r [not equal to] 0, the use of Lemma 4 gives
The next result follows obviously from the proof of Lemmas 3 and 4.
In the proofs of the following Lemmas, Bob will frequently employ a strategy called a forcing move.
On central critical values of the degree four L-functions for GSp (4); the fundamental lemma, III.
These units would activate the lemmas for martillo (hammer) and for -azo (blow/great), but also for martillazo (hammer blow).
The following two lemmas show the inductive relation that exists between two consecutive validprefix sets.
If G is not Hamiltonian, by Lemma 2, there exists longest path [P.
The next two lemmas display analytic properties of Z(s) that are needed in Section 6.