item generation

item generation

In a clinical trial, that which establishes the content to be covered by the items in a peer-review organisation (PRO) instrument, including item wording, evaluating the completeness of item coverage of the concepts of interest, and assessing clarity and readability.
References in periodicals archive ?
All empirical and theoretical literature was studied for item generation.
The study 1 dealt with the item generation process.
In study 1, a rigorous process of item generation was adopted based on literature review.
Developing automatic question item generation for online assessments based on open educational resources (OER)
As summarized by Polit and Beck (2006), CV has two distinct phases: "a priori efforts by the scale developer to enhance content validity through careful conceptualization and domain analysis prior to item generation, and a posteriori efforts to evaluate the relevance of the scale's content through expert assessment" (p.
Scale development was carried out in two phases: (a) item generation, through which the research team, in close collaboration with a long-term community partner, created scale items based on content analysis of interviews with eight community partners, observations of existing community-university partnerships, and insights from the research literature; and (b) item analysis, through which the psychometric properties of the scale were examined and the scale slightly revised based on results of administering the scale to a sample of 31 community partners.
The initial phase of the development and item generation of the ITCCC was informed by a comprehensive review of teaching theory (e.
They look at automatic item generation from perspectives of initial considerations, connecting theory and practice, psychological foundations, and technical developments.
Study 1, described the methods used for item generation for Marital Satisfaction Scale.
The remaining stages of item generation will involve testing the relevance to ulnar nerve palsy of functional questions from existing validated generic upper limb questionnaires, and consultation with hand surgeons and therapists regarding questionnaire content.
The instrument development process included: item generation interviews, a pilot test, a reliability sample, and data analysis.