frequentist method

frequentist method

Any statistical device—e.g., significance tests and confidence intervals—that can be interpreted in terms of the frequency of certain outcomes occurring in hypothetical repeated realisations of the same experimental situation.
References in periodicals archive ?
probability of proportion of false positives among the significant QTL, while frequentist methods set stringent thresholds due to huge number of SNPs markers in the GWAS test (Fernando and Garrick, 2013).
The methods considered can be broadly classified as a) frequentist methods to address study biases systematically and quantitatively; b) Bayesian statistical techniques, which utilize prior knowledge addressing causal hypotheses and estimation problems under evaluation; and c) computational methods (e.
The management researcher faced with a choice between Bayesian and frequentist methods has much to consider.
The second element is the application of frequentist methods to a valuation problem that is not a problem of population characterization and does not require probability (random) sampling.
The superiority of Baysean meta-analysis over frequentist methods is, therefore, not clear but does represent a reasonable line of enquiry.
will discuss an innovative software tool developed jointly with Merck Research Labs that simulates adaptive dose allocation and compares the efficiency of adaptive Bayesian and frequentist methods to traditional designs.
These calculations require that a researcher take a stance on the use of Bayesian versus frequentist methods.
In concurrence, the means, variances, and covariances of the Bayes posterior distribution for stock proportions approximate closely the observed stock proportions, their estimated variances, and their estimated covariances, respectively, from frequentist methods.
Unlike frequentist methods, explains Berry, Bayesian methods assign anything unknown a probability using information from previous experiments.
The Bayesian view of statistical inference, an increasingly popular alternative to standard frequentist methods, acknowledges that we have beliefs about the phenomena under study and seeks to formalize the role these play in the way we view our data (32).
However, for phase III trials, frequentist methods still play a dominant role through controlling type I and type II errors in the hypothesis testing framework.