The analysis of secure, depersonalised WiFi data could enable us to map the journey patterns of millions of passengers and understand in much greater detail how people move around our transport network.
This pilot has revealed useful insights into how people criss-cross London using the Tube, and the potential benefits this depersonalised data could unlock, from providing better customer data to helping address overcrowding, are enormous.
Taking this analysis further, fundamental to the maintenance and reproduction of disciplinary power is offering subjects the ontological security necessary as subjects to act intentionally within a set of depersonalised regulatory technologies.
Highlighted, in turn, is how individuals turn to and invest in the government and sovereignty more generally, to help them navigate and individuate themselves within a seemingly depersonalised disciplinary system.
The former, again, connotes the inscription of individuals within broader inscriptive discourses and practices while the latter is the affective identity supplementing these depersonalised regimes of power.
Individuals continue to affectively invest in this externalised authority for anchoring their identity and thus achieving a precarious ontological security within otherwise depersonalised and diverse configurations of modern disciplinary power.
Individuals, therefore, affectively invest in the 'heroism' of successful CEOs and entrepreneurs, as a way to maintain the illusion of selfhood in an otherwise depersonalised and regulative capitalist world.
Additionally, it permits them to quite literally 'identify' disciplinary power, associating these depersonalised regimes with a given sovereign figure.
It provides a fantasmatic scenario in which individuals can and do have power over depersonalised norms and procedures shaping their 'conduct', where they are not merely a subject of power but also a powerful subject.
Namely, the more depersonalised and therefore non-sovereign power in practice becomes the greater the desire for sovereignty is subjectively.
Fetishes are more common in men, and if arousal becomes more to do with the action - spanking, for instance - than with the partner, even the strongest- willed woman will feel depersonalised