The
Occam's Razor principle dictates that the simplest of competing theories should be chosen.
My mind began racing through our long and messy "Landing Gear Handle Down Indicates Unsafe" checklist when our pilot used
Occam's razor to determine his next course of action.
Sumida believes that Clausewitz's method is obscured by his use of inaccurate nomenclature and using the term "critical analysis" rather than "historical reenactment." On this point, one might do well to apply a version of
Occam's razor that the simplest explanation is the best and that perhaps Clausewitz used the term "critical analysis" because that is what he meant to say.
Moreover, it embodies
Occam's razor, which states that "entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity".
The second possibility, which I think is much more likely, is that we don't really have
Occam's razor [see note 1].
Occam's razor would suggest this is quite possible, and it seems more consistent with recent American eating and sleeping habits.
In particular,
Occam's razor, the principle named after William of Occam, a 14th-century philosopher, does not apply in this setting.
But hey, let's follow the example of the DJs, and apply
Occam's Razor for a moment.
Occam's razor says, if it seems like there is mocking:
Of course,
Occam's razor would suggest that men and women are exaggerating and downplaying their bedpost notches, respectively.
Lean is the ultimate application of
Occam's Razor: "Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem," which is paraphrased as "All things being equal, the best solution is the simplest one." In other words, Lean forces you to Keep It Simple, Stupid.