Gleason grading system


Also found in: Wikipedia.

Gleason grading system

Oncology The most widely used system for stratifying the histologic features of prostate CA, delineated by Gleason, dividing the lesions into 5 groups of ↓ glandular differentiation and worsening prognosis

Gleason grading system

A method of predicting the tendency of a tumor in the prostate to metastasize based on how similar the tumor is to normal prostate tissue.
Mentioned in: Prostate Cancer
References in periodicals archive ?
pseudohyperplastic, foamy gland, mucinous, ductal) have given rise to a need for revision of the Gleason grading system and important modifications were performed by the conferences convened by the ISUP, firstly in 2005 and more recently in 2014 (Figure 1) (4,10).
9] Nearly after 50 years the Gleason grading system remains novel, in that it is based on the architectural pattern of the tumour alone (Gleason patterns 1-5); the sum of the two most common patterns- that is primary Gleason pattern plus secondary Gleason pattern equals Gleason Score (GS)--conveys the most clinical meaning.
This edition has a new chapter on pathologic conditions of the ureter and renal pelvis; new entities; new renal cell carcinoma subtypes and intraductal carcinoma of the prostate; immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of major genitourinary diseases and specimen handling, reporting, and staging for all major urologic malignancies; and updates to the International Society of Urological Pathology/Vancouver classification of renal tumors, the Gleason grading system for prostate cancer, and the Fuhrman grading system for renal cell carcinoma.
Upgrading and downgrading of prostate cancer from biopsy to radical prostatectomy: Incidence and predictive factors using the modified Gleason grading system and factoring in tertiary grades.
to develop the Oncotype DX Genomic Prostate Score, designed to be used in conjunction with the Gleason grading system, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, and other clinical parameters to personalize treatment based on the underlying biology of an individual patient's prostate cancer.
Tomaszewski: The Gleason grading system is the most powerful grading tool for the prediction of outcome amongst all the tumor systems.
Prostate cancer grading: a decade after the 2005 modified Gleason grading system [published online ahead of print January 12, 2016].
In PAC cases, each case was graded according to the International Society of Urological Pathology modified Gleason grading system [10] and distributed according to their
By doing so, we will elucidate how recent events - specifically, the advent of active surveillance and the update in the Gleason grading system - have influenced the discordance rates over time.