As the Chi Square
value was found greater than the table value at 0.
577 done Table 12: Factors Affecting Surgical Site Infection, Results of Chi- squared test Risk Pearson Df P Significance Factors Chi Square
Value 1 Haematocrit 1.
Table 3 presents a summary of the forms included in these two classes, that is, their 35 most representative forms, showing the frequency of each form in the class, its total frequency in the analyzed segments, the percentage of the form in the class, and the value of its chi square
of association, calculated from a table such as Table 1 (for each value, df= 1;N= 622, p < .
The table shows that the chi square
value X2 pless than 0.
]: 2,957 Table 5: Corelation Between The Students' Gender And The Level Of Noticing Food Quality Certificates.
Based on the Chi square
analysis, it can be seen that the first application Software is the only one that results in the Null Hypothesis not being rejected.
Again, this Chi Square
finding is based exclusively on a comparison of Haitian and Hispanic responses, but ANOVA results which include African American responses also revealed significant variations by ethnicity (F = 4.
There were no statistically significant differences in perception of viability by age Chi square
(1, N = 35) = 15.
Once again, a Chi Square
analysis was not possible due to cell size restrictions.
Statistically significant chi square
(or difference of chi square
) statistics occur because of the large sample sizes.
Barnett suggests using a chi square
test to make this process more objective.
and binomial tests enabled a determination of the statistical significance of the outcomes (even though the population of World Series games, rather than a sample was used, there is precedence for using inductive statistics under these conditions .