carmine

(redirected from Carmines)
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Encyclopedia.

car·mine

(kar'min, kar'mēn), [C.I. 75470]
Red coloring matter used as a histology stain produced from coccinellin derived from cochineal; treatment of coccinellin with alum forms an aluminum lake of carminic acid, the essential constituent of carmine.
[Mediev. L. carminus, contr. fr. carmisinus, fr. Ar. qirmizē, the cochineal insect]

carmine

/car·mine/ (kahr´min) a red coloring matter used as a histologic stain.
indigo carmine  indigotindisulfonate sodium.

car·mine

(kahr'mēn)
[CI 75470] Red coloring matter used as a histology stain, derived from cochineal.
[Mediev. L. carminus, contr. fr. carmisinus, fr. Ar. qirmizē, the cochineal insect]
References in periodicals archive ?
Tess Winningham, CEO & Co Founder of Carmine and Alignment Simple Solutions said in a press statement, "Women spend over $300 billion a year on car maintenance and repairs around the globe.
Carmine is aimed at helping every woman be fully prepared to deal with and avoid car-related emergencies with knowledge and confidence.
Exclusive Carmine Membership that will unlock your access to:
To attract men and women to support the Carmine crowdfunding Indiegogo campaign, a number of exciting perks are on offer.
Sniderman and Carmines do not help their case by characterizing people who hold one of the other three views described in the first paragraph as "both wrong and wrongheaded" (p.
But the main reason that the argument is controversial is the point with which I began: Sniderman and Carmines insist that racial conservatives deserve the same standing as racial liberals, that liberals are just as likely (or even more so) to be racially hypocritical as conservatives, and that ignoring race is the best way to reduce racial inequality.
But Sniderman and Carmines find: "Race prejudice, far from dominating and orchestrating the opposition to affirmative action, makes only a slight contribution to it.
Sniderman and Carmines present no data to support this contention.
While Sniderman and Carmines provide compelling polling data on an array of affirmative action questions, the book does not and cannot fully explain the tug of war over preferential policies, for the complete story requires a discussion of interest group politics.