binomial nomenclature

(redirected from Biological nomenclature)
Also found in: Dictionary, Encyclopedia, Wikipedia.
Related to Biological nomenclature: Binomial name

nomenclature

 [no´men-kla″chur]
terminology; a classified system of technical names, such as of anatomical structures or organisms.
binomial nomenclature the nomenclature used in scientific classification of living organisms in which each organism is designated by two latinized names (genus and species), both of which must always be used because species names are not necessarily unique. note: The genus name is always capitalized, the species name is not, and both are italicized, e.g., Escherichia coli. When a name is repeated the genus name may be abbreviated by its initial, e.g., E. coli.

lin·nae·an sys·tem of no·men·cla·ture

the system of nomenclature in which the names of species are composed of two parts, a generic name and a specific epithet (species name, in botany).
[Carl von Linné]

binomial nomenclature

n.
The scientific naming of species whereby each species receives a Latin or Latinized name of two parts, the first indicating the genus and the second being the specific epithet. For example, Juglans regia is the English walnut; Juglans nigra, the black walnut.

binomial nomenclature

Etymology: L, bis, twice; Gk, nomos, law; L, nomenclatio, calling by name
a system of classification of animals, plants, and other life forms (developed by Carl Linné) that assigns a two-part Latinized name referring respectively to the organism's genus and species, such as Homo sapiens for humans.

binomial nomenclature

The naming convention for living organisms in which each organism is identified by 2 names: genus (e.g., Pneumocystis) and species (e.g., jiroveci).

bi·no·mi·al no·men·cla·ture

(bī-nō'mē-ăl nō'mĕn-klā'chŭr)
Naming system in which each species of animal or plant has a name composed of two terms, one identifying the genus to which it belongs and the second the species.

binomial nomenclature

in this the FOVEA, an area of acute vision, is of particular importance. Binocular vision results in a stereoscopic or 3-D effect, the slightly different positions of the two eyes being important in that they view the object from slightly different angles.

binomial nomenclature

the basis of the present scientific nomenclature of animals and plants, each of which is given a generic name followed by a specific name, in Greek, Latin or often Latinized English. The generic name invariably has an initial capital letter, and the specific name, even if it is the name of a person, an initial small letter, both names being in italics, or underlined. Thus the robin is named Erithacus rubecula. All scientific names used before the publication of the 10th edition of LINNAEUS'S Systema Naturae (1758) are no longer applicable, and the names given since then have priority by date as a rule, the earliest name for an organism being given preference over others. Often the scientific name is followed by the name of the person allocating the name and the date, e.g. Erithacus rubecula (L.) 1766. L. is an abbreviation for Linnaeus, and the brackets indicate a change from the genus in which he originally placed it; where genera and species are redefined, change of generic name is allowable. The robin was originally named Motacilla rubecula L. 1766. Motacilla is now the genus including wagtails, a group not closely related to robins which were subsequently placed in the genus Erithacus.

nomenclature

terminology; a classified system of technical names, as of anatomical structures, organisms, etc.

binomial nomenclature
the system of designating plants and animals by two latinized words signifying the genus and species.
References in periodicals archive ?
Stability of names is the only criterion of interest to de Queiroz, but it can hardly be the only relevant criterion in evaluating a system of biological nomenclature.
Unfortunately, many recent popular articles on biological nomenclature have not made the critical distinction between nomenclature and taxonomy and thus give the impression that taxonomists continue to employ Linnaeus's taxonomy.
Because names are basically a tool for communication, taxonomists need to address two questions: 1) Is the current system of biological nomenclature resulting in an unacceptable amount of miscommunication; and 2) Will the alternative phylogenetic nomenclature system do a better job of communicating information to all users of taxon names?
I believe the lack of information content from the name itself in a rankless approach to nomenclature and the serious risk of content change associated with the explicit phylogenetic definitions make this system inappropriate as a replacement for the current system of biological nomenclature.
A phylogenetic approach to biological nomenclature as an alternative to the Linoaean systems in current use.

Full browser ?